The Welfare regimes in the twilight of conservative modernization

possibilities and limits to social citizenship in Latin America

Authors

  • Fernando Filgueira Investigador senior de CIPPEC (Argentina)

Keywords:

Latin America, Democracy, Social Policies, Social Citizenship.

Abstract

Latin America is undergoing a profound transformation of its social policies and of the very concept of social citizenship. I argue in this article that such transformation takes place within a broader epochal change: the end of conservative modernization as it was defined in Barrington Moore´s seminal work.  The triumph of electoral democracy, urbanization, increased educational attainment and increased exposure to new and broader consumption patterns have destroyed the political basis of conservative modernization dynamics. While access to arenas and statuses that turn expectations into legitimate demands has expanded radically, access to the means to satisfy such demands has remained static (unequal and segmented) until the end of the century. The shift to the left in the region should be interpreted as the political solution to this second and final crisis of incorporation of the conservative modernization pattern. The “Washington Consensus” was indeed the last attempt of incorporation under the pattern of conservative modernization. It is in this context that the possibility of a new social citizenship based on universality of entitlements emerges. But for this to happen it is not enough that elites are no longer able to control the political and economic game through status enclosure and authoritarianism. In order to craft truly universal social policies narrow corporatism and restricted targeting -and the political economy they sustain- have to be confronted as well. Contributory models based on formal wages and targeted social policies based on need will not disappear, but they have to take the back seat to a model of basic universalism where entitlements in transfers and services are not dependent on need nor labor formality.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arditi, Benjamín. (2008). “Arguments about the left turn(s) in Latin America: A Post-Liberal Politics?”, Latin American Research Review. 43(3):59-81.

Banco Mundial. (2009). World Development Indicators, Washington, World Bank Electronic Resources Data Set.

BID (Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo). (2012). Recaudar no basta: los impuestos como instrumento de desarrollo. Editores: Ana Corbacho, Vicente Fretes Cibils y Eduardo Lora. Editor: BID.

Blofield, Merike y Juan Pablo Luna. (2011). “Public Opinion on Income in Latin America”, en Merike Blofield (ed.). The Great Gap: Inequality and the Politics of Redistribution in Latin America. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press. (pp. 147-181)

Castañeda, Jorge. (2006). “Latin America’s Left Turn”. Foreign Affairs. 85(3):28-43.

Cecchini, Simone y Rodrigo Martínez. (2011). Protección social inclusiva: Una mirada integral, un enfoque de derechos. Libro de CEPAL no. 111. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL.

CEPAL (2012) Panorama social de América Latina. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL.

CEPAL (2011a). Panorama social de América Latina. Santiago de Chile.

CEPAL (2010a). Panorama social de América Latina. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL.

CEPAL (2010b). La hora de la igualdad: brechas por cerrar, caminos por abrir. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL.

CEPAL (2009). Panorama social de América Latina. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL.

CEPAL (2008). Panorama social de América Latina. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL.

CEPAL (2007). Panorama social de América Latina, Santiago de Chile: CEPAL.

CEPAL (2002). Panorama social de América Latina. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL.

CEPAL (2001). Panorama social de América Latina, Santiago de Chile: CEPAL.

CEPAL (2000). Panorama social de América Latina, Santiago de Chile: CEPAL.

Cohen, Ernesto y Rolando Franco. (2006). “Los programas de transferencias con corresponsabilidad en América Latina. Similitudes y diferencias”, en Cohen, Ernesto. y Rolando Franco. (Comps.) Transferencias con corresponsabilidad. Una mirada Latinoamericana. México DF: FLACSO México–SEDESOL.(pp.21-84).

ECLAC. (2006). Shaping the Future of Social Protection. Access, Financing and Solidarity. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL.

Filgueira, Carlos. (1981). “Consumption in the New Latin American Models”, en ECLAC Review. 15(1):71-110.

Filgueira, Fernando, Luis Reygadas, Juan Pablo Luna y Pablo Alegre. (2011). “Shallow States, Deep Inequalities and the limits of Conservative Modernization: The Politics and Policies of Incorporation in Latin America” en Blofield, Merike, The Great Gap. Inequalities and the Politics of Redistribution in Latin America. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press. (pp. 245-277).

Filgueira, Fernando y Diego Hernández (2012). Uruguay. Sistemas de Protección Social en América Latina y el Caribe. CEPAL/GIZ. Santiago de Chile.

Filgueira, Fernando. (1999). “Tipos de Welfare y reformas sociales en América Latina: eficiencia, residualismo y ciudadanía estratificada”. En Barreto Campelo, de Melo Marcus, André (ed.), Reforma do Estado e mudanca institucional no Brasil. Recife: Editora Massangana. (pp.123-158).

Gómez-Sabaini, Juan C. (2006). “Cohesión Social, Equidad y Tributación. Análisis y perspectivas para América Latina”. Documento presentado en el Seminario Cohesión Social en América Latina y el Caribe. Una revisión perentoria de alguna de sus dimensiones. CEPAL, Panamá, 2006.

Lavigne, Milena, (2013a). Perú. Sistemas de Protección Social en América Latina y el Caribe. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL-GIZ.

Lavigne, Milena, (2013b). Paraguay. Sistemas de Protección Social en América Latina y el Caribe. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL-GIZ.

Martinez Franzoni, Juliana. (2008). Domesticar la incertidumbre en América Latina: mercado laboral, política social y familias. San José: Editorial de la Universidad de Costa Rica/UNDP.

Martinez Franzoni, Juliana (2013). El Salvador. Sistemas de Protección Social en América Latina y el Caribe. CEPAL/GIZ. Santiago de Chile.

Martínez Franzoni, Juliana y Koen Voorend (2009). “Sistemas de patriarcado y regímenes de bienestar en América Latina ¿Una cosa lleva a la otra?”. Documento de trabajo Serie 27. Madrid: Fundación Carolina.

Midaglia, Carmen y Florencía Antía. (2007) “La izquierda en el gobierno: ¿cambio o continuidad en las políticas de bienestar social?” Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Política 16(1): 131-157.

Rodriguez Mojica, Alexis (2013). Panamá. Sistemas de Protección Social en América Latina y el Caribe. CEPAL/GIZ. Santiago de Chile.

Moore, Barrington. (1966). The Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Boston: Beacon Press.

Pribble, Jennifer, (2013). Welfare and Party Politics in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Przeworski, Adam, Michael E. Alvarez, José Antonio Cheibub y Fernando Limongi. (2000). Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950-1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Repetto, Fabian y Fernanda Potenza Dal Maseto. (2012). Argentina. Sistemas de Protección Social en América Latina y el Caribe. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL-GIZ.

Roberts, Kenneth. (2008). “The Mobilization of Opposition to Economic Liberalization”. Annual Review of Political Science 11: 327-349.

Smith, Peter. (2004). “Cycles of Electoral Democracy in Latin America 1990-2000”. Berkeley, Centre for Latin American Studies, University of Berkeley at California, Working Paper #6.

Valencia Lomelí, Enrique, Foust Rodríguez, David y Weber T. Darcy. (2013). México. Sistemas de Protección Social en América Latina y el Caribe. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL-GIZ.

Downloads

Published

2018-11-12

How to Cite

The Welfare regimes in the twilight of conservative modernization: possibilities and limits to social citizenship in Latin America. (2018). Revista Uruguaya De Ciencia Política, 22(2), 10-37. https://rucp.cienciassociales.edu.uy/index.php/rucp/article/view/342