Populism and democracy crisis: popular sovereignty in dispute

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26851/RUCP.32.2.6

Keywords:

Populism, democracy, democratic political theory, popular sovereignty, political conflicts

Abstract

Processes from different origins and dimensions —institutional, economic, political and social— expose questions about the quality of democracies and their normative foundations, marking the so‑called «democracy crisis». On the axis of political processes, especially in relation to the construction of collective subjects and their representation in democratic contexts, populism has been mobilized as an important explanatory key and different diagnoses have been offered about it: on the one hand, there are those who interpret it as a dimension of politics and they bet on its ability to radicalize democracies, as seen in the theories of Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe; on the other hand, there is the interpretation that populism alters the nature of democracies, above all, disfiguring it by disputing its distinctive normative elements, as in Nadia Urbinati's analysis. Both positions, however, resume the notion of popular sovereignty, disputing the role of populism in the constitution of (new) forms of political mobilization and activation of different collective identities in current political conflicts. This article seeks to take up such interpretations to problematize this aspect of the complex relationship between populism and democracy.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ALBERTAZZI, D., y MCDONNELL, D. (comps.) (2008). Twenty-First Century Populism. Nueva York, Estados Unidos: Palgrave MacMillan.
ARDITI, B. (2007). Politics on the Edges of Liberalism: Difference, Populism, Revolution, Agitation. Edimburgo, Escocia: Edinburgh University Press.
BIROLI, F., y TEIXEIRA, R. (2022). Contra o gênero: a «ideologia de gênero» na Câmara dos Deputados brasileira. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política, 38, 1 40.
BROWN, W. (2019). Nas ruínas do neoliberalismo: A ascensão da política antidemocrática no Ocidente. San Pablo, Brasil: Politeia.
CANOVAN, M. (1981). Populism. Nueva York, Estados Unidos: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
— (1999). Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy. Political Studies, 47 (1), 2 16.
CASSIMIRO, P. (2021). Os usos do conceito de populismo no debate contemporâneo e suas implicações sobre a interpretação da democracia. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Políti-ca, 35, 1 52.
CASTELLS, M. (2018). Ruptura: a crise da democracia liberal. San Pablo, Brasil: Zahar.
COOPER, M. (2017). Family values: Between neoliberalism and the new social conserva-tism. Cambridge, Massachusetts, Estados Unidos: MIT Press.
DERRIDA, J. (1988). Limited Inc. Evanston, Illinois, Estados Unidos: Northwestern Uni-versity Press. Recuperado de: ‹http://lab404.com/misc/ltdinc.pdf›.
FINCHELSTEIN, F. (2017). From Fascism to Populism in History. Oakland, California, Esta-dos Unidos: University California Press.
FRASER, N. (2018). Do neoliberalismo progressista a Trump –e além. Política & Socieda-de, 17 (40), 43 64.
— (2019). Neoliberalismo progressista versus populismo reacionário: a escolha de Hob-son. En H. Geiselberger (comp.), A grande regressão: um debate internacional sobre os novos populismos–e como enfrentá los (pp. 43 64). San Pablo, Brasil: Estação Li-berdade.
FREEDEN, M. (2006). Ideologies and Political Theory: A Conceptual Approach. Oxford, Reino Unido: Oxford University Press.
GERMANI, G. (1978). Authoritarianism, Fascism, and National Populism. New Brunswick, Canadá: Transaction Books.
HABERMAS, J. (1992). Faktizität und Geltung. Beitrage zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats. Fráncfort del Meno: Suhrkamp.
HAWKINS, A., y KALTWASSER, R. (2019). Introduction: The Ideational Approach. En A. HAWKINS et al. (comps.), The Ideational Approach to Populism: Concept, Theory, and Analysis (pp. 1 24). Londres, Reino Unido: Routledge.
INGLEHART, F., y NORRIS, P. (2016). «Trump, Brexit and the Rise of Populism: Economic Have nots and Cultural Backlash». Harvard JFK School of Government Faculty Working Papers Series (RWP16 026).
KRITSCH, R., y SILVA, A. (2022). Esfera pública e democracia no pensamento de J. Rawls, J. Habermas e C. Mouffe: teorias políticas e democráticas em debate. Lua Nova. Re-vista de Cultura e Política, 116, 275 334.
LACLAU, E. (2005a). Populism: What’s in a Name? En F. Panizza (comp.), Populism and the Mirror of Democracy (pp. 32 49). Londres, Reino Unido: Verso.
— (2005b). La razón populista. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
LACLAU, E., y MOUFFE, C. (2015). Hegemonia e Estratégia Socialista: por uma política democrática radical. San Pablo, Brasil: Intermeios.
LEFORT, C. (1991). Democratie et representation. En D. Pecaut y B. Sorj (eds), Metamorphoses de la representation politique (pp. 223 232). París, Francia: Editions du CNRS.
— (1992). La representación no agota a la democracia. En M. R. Dos Santos (ed.), ¿Qué queda de la representación política? (pp. 139 145). Caracas, Venezuela: Nueva Sociedad.
LEVITSKY, S., y ZIBLATT, D. (2018). Como as democracias morrem. San Pablo, Brasil: Zahar.
MALKOPOULOU, A., y KIRSHNER, A. (comps.) (2019). Militant Democracy and Its Critics: Populism, Parties, Extremism. Edimburgo, Escocia: Edinburgh University Press.
MENDONÇA, D. (2012). Antagonismo como identificação política. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política, 9, 205 228.
MOFFITT, B. (2016). The global rise of populism: performance, political style, and represen-tation. Redwood City, California, Estados Unidos: Stanford University Press.
MOLINA, L. (2023). Terra Rasgada: como avança o garimpo na Amazônia brasileira. Bra-silia, Brasil: Aliança em Defesa dos Territórios.
MOUFFE, C. (2005a). The «End of Politics» and the Challenge of Right wing Populism. En F. PANIZZA (comp.), Populism and the Mirror of Democracy (pp. 50 71). Lon-dres, Reino Unido: Verso.
— (2005b). Por um modelo agonístico de democracia. Revista de Sociologia Política, 25, 165 177.
— (2015). Sobre o político. San Pablo, Brasil: Martins Fontes.
— (2019). Por um populismo de esquerda. San Pablo, Brasil: Autonomia Literária.
MOUNK, Y. (2019). O povo contra a democracia. San Pablo, Brasil Companhia das Letras.
MUDDE, C. (2004). The Populist «Zeitgeist». Government and Opposition, 39 (4), 541 563.
MUDDE, C., y KALTWASSER, C. (2017). Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford, Estados Unidos: Oxford University Press.
MÜLLER, J.-W. (2012). Towards a Political Theory of Populism. Notizie Politeia, 107, 19 29.
OSTIGUY, P.; PANIZZA, F., y MOFFITT, B. (2021). Introduction. En P. OSTIGUY, F. PANIZZA y B. MOFFITT (comps.), Populism Global in Perspective: a performative and discur-sive approach (pp. 21 46). Nueva York, Estados Unidos: Routledge.
PANIZZA, F. (2005). Populism and the Mirror of Democracy. En F. PANIZZA (comp.), Pop-ulism in the Mirror of Democracy (pp. 1 31). Londres, Reino Unido: Verso.
PANIZZA, F., y STAVRAKAKIS, Y. (2021). Populism, hegemony and the political construc-tion of «The People». En P. OSTIGUY, F. PANIZZA y B. MOFFITT (comps.), Populism Global in Perspective: a performative and discursive approach (pp. 21 46). Nueva York, Estados Unidos: Routledge.
PRZEWORSKI, A. (2020). Crises da democracia. San Pablo, Brasil: Companhia das Letras.
RAWLS, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
ROSANVALLON, P. (2007). La contrademocracia: la política en la era de la desconfianza. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Ediciones Manantial.
— (2021). The Populist Century: History, Theory, Critique. Cambridge, Reino Unido: Polity Press.
SKOCPOL, T., y WILLIAMSON, V. (2012). The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism. Nueva York, Estados Unidos: Oxford University Press.
TAGGART, P. (2002). Populism and the Pathology of Representative Politics. En Y. Mény y Y. Surel (comps.). Democracies and the Populist Challenge (pp. 62 80). Basing-stoke, Hampshire, Reino Unido: Palgrave Macmillan.
URBINATI, N. (1998). Democracy and Populism. Constellations, 5 (1), 110 124.
— (2014). Democracy Disfigured: Opinion, Truth and the People. Cambridge, Massachu-setts, Estados Unidos: Harvard University Press.
— (2019a). Me the People: how populism transforms democracy. Cambridge, Massachu-setts, Estados Unidos: Harvard University Press.
— (2019b). Political Theory of Populism. Annual Review of Political Science, 22, 111 127.
— (2021). A teoria política do populismo. Exilium. Revista de Estudos da Contemporanei-dade, 2 (3), 299 334.

Downloads

Published

2023-11-29

How to Cite

Populism and democracy crisis: popular sovereignty in dispute. (2023). Revista Uruguaya De Ciencia Política, 32(2). https://doi.org/10.26851/RUCP.32.2.6