Confrontando la gobernanza electoral: desconfianza y protestas en América Latina
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26851/RUCP.33.20Palabras clave:
protestas, gobernanza electoral, partidos políticos, gestión electoral, eleccionesResumen
¿Cuándo rechazan los partidos políticos los resultados electorales? Incluso décadas después de la transición democrática, los conflictos y protestas postelectorales siguen siendo comunes en muchos países latinoamericanos. Este artículo sostiene que la confianza en la gestión electoral puede predecir las decisiones de los competidores políticos entre dos estrategias alternativas: desafío o cumplimiento. El presente trabajo utiliza un diseño de investigación de N medio y un modelo multinivel para analizar las elecciones en 18 países latinoamericanos desde la redemocratización y encuentra apoyo al argumento de que ceteris paribus, la desconfianza en la imparcialidad de las elecciones predice las reacciones desafiantes de los competidores políticos.
Descargas
Referencias
ACE Project. (2015). EMB Members: Respected Experts or Watchdogs on Each Other?
Anderson, C., Blais, A., Bowler, S., et al. (2005). Losers’ Consent: Elections and Democratic Legitimacy. Oxford University Press.
Beaulieu, E. (2014) Electoral Protest and Demoracy in the developing world. Cambridge University Press.
Birch, S. (2008). Electoral institutions and popular confidence in electoral processes: A cross-national analysis. Electoral Studies (27), 305-320.
Birch, S. (2011). Electoral Malpractice. Oxford University Press.
Bowler, S., Brunell, T., Donovan, T., et al. (2015). Election administration and perceptions of fair elections. Electoral Studies (38), 1-9.
Catt, H., Ellis, A., Maley, M., et al. (2014). Electoral management design. International IDEA.
Chernykh, S. (2014). When Do Political Parties Protest Election Results? Comparative Political Studies, 47(10): 1359-1383.
Chernykh, S. (2015). Beyond the Opposition: Who Rejects Electoral Results? Electoral Integrity Project, Working Paper Series, 4(1).
Chernykh, S., Svolik, M. W. (2015). Third-Party Actors and the Success of Democracy: How Electoral Commissions, Courts, and Observers Shape Incentives for Electoral Manipulation and Post-Election Protests. The Journal of Politics, 77(2), 407- 420.
Clark, A. (2015) The relationship between political parties and their regulators. Party Politics, 23(6), 646-656.
Coppedge, M., Gerring, J., Knutsen, C. H., Lindberg, S. I., Teorell, J., Altman, D., Angiolillo, F., Bernhard, M., Borella, C., Cornell, A., Fish, M. S., Fox, L., Gastaldi, L., Gjerløw, H., Glynn, A., God, A. G., Grahn, S., Hicken, A., Kinzelbach, K., … Ziblatt, D. (2024). V-Dem [Country-Year/Country-Date] Dataset v14. V. o. D. V.-D. Project.
Coppedge, M., Gerring, J., Lindberg, S. I., et al. (2017b). V-Dem Methodology v7.1 - Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project.
Donno, D. (2013). Defending Democratic Norms - International actors and the politics of electoral misconduct. Oxford University Press.
Edgell, A., Mechkova, V., Altman, D., et al. (2015). When and Where do Elections Matter? A Global Test of the Democratization by Elections Hypothesis, 1900-2012.
Eisenstadt, T. (2004). Courting Democracy in Mexico: Party Strategies and Electoral Institutions. Cambridge University Press.
Estevez, F., Magar, E., Rosas, G. (2008). Partisanship in non-partisan electoral agencies and democratic compliance: Evidence from Mexico’s Federal Electoral Institute. Electoral Studies (27), 257-271.
Fearon, J. D. (2011). Self-enforcing democracy. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(4), 1661-1708.
Fortin-Rittberger, J., Harfst, P., Dingler, S. (2017). The costs of electoral fraud: establishing the link between electoral integrity, winning an election, and satisfaction with democracy. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 27(3), 350-368.
Hartlyn, J. (1998). The Struggle for Democratic Politics in the Dominican Republic. The University of North Carolina Press.
Hartlyn, J., McCoy, J., Mustillo, T. M. (2008). Electoral Governance Matters: Explaining the Quality of Elections in Contemporary Latin America. Comparative Political Studies 41(1), 73-98.
Hernández-Huerta, V. A. (2017). Judging Presidential Elections Around the World: An Overview. Election Law Journal, 16(3), 377-396.
Hyde, S. D., Marinov, N. (2021). National Elections Across Democracy and Autocracy.
Hyde, S. D., Marinov, N. (2012). Which Elections Can Be Lost? Political Analysis, 20(2), 191-201.
Hyde, S. D., Marinov, N. (2014). Information and Self-Enforcing Democracy: The Role of International Election Observation. International Organization, 68(2), 329-359.
Kelley, J. G. (2012). Monitoring Democracy: When International Election Observation Works, and Why It Often Fails. Princeton University Press.
King, G., Zeng, L. (2001). Logistic Regression in Rare Events Data. Department of Government, Harvard University. http://gking.harvard.edu
Lago, I., Martinez i Coma, F. (2016). Challenge or Consent? Understanding Losers’ Reactions in Mass Elections. Government and Opposition.
Lehoucq, F. E. (2002). Can Parties Police Themselves? Electoral Governance and Democratization. International Political Science Review, 23(1), 29-46.
Lindberg, S. I. (2009). Democratization by elections - a new mode of transition. The John Hopkins University Press.
López-Pintor, R. (2000). Electoral Management Bodies as Institutions of Governance. UNDP Bureau for Development Policy.
Mainwaring, S., Pérez-Liñán, A. (2007). Why Regions of the World Are Important: Regional Specificities and Region-Wide Diffusion of Democracy. In G. Munck (Ed.), Regimes and Democracy in Latin America: Theories and Methods. Oxford University Press.
Mainwaring, S., Pérez-Liñán, A. (2013). Democracies and Dictatorships in Latin America - Emergence, Survival, and Fall. Cambridge University Press.
Mainwaring, S., Pérez-Liñán, A. (2015). Cross-Currents in Latin America. Journal of Democracy, 26(1), 114-127.
Maldonado, A., Seligson, M. (2014). Electoral trust in Latin America. In P. Norris, R. W. Frank and F. Martinez i Coma (Eds.), Advancing Electoral Integrity. Oxford University Press.
Molina, J., Hernández, J. (1998). La credibilidad de las elecciones latinoamericanas y sus factores. El efecto de los organismos electorales, el sistema de partidos y las actitudes políticas. XXI Congreso Internacional de la Asociación de Estudios Latinoamericanos. LASA.
Mozaffar, S., Schedler, A. (2002). The Comparative Study of Electoral Governance—Introduction. International Political Science Review, 23(1), 5-27.
Nadeau, R., Blais, A. (1993). Accepting the Election Outcome: The Effect of Participation on Losers’ Consent. British Journal of Political Science, 23(4), 553-563.
Norris, P. (2014). Why Electoral Integrity Matters. Cambridge University Press.
Norris, P. (2015). Why Elections Fail. Cambridge University Press.
Norris, P. (2022). In Praise of Skepticism: trust but verify. Oxford University Press.
Norris, P., Frank, R. W., Martinez i Coma, F. (2015). Contentious elections - from votes to violence. In P. Norris, R. W. Frank, and F. Martinez i Coma (Eds.) Contentious elections - from ballots to barricades. Routledge.
Norris, P., Walgrave, S., Van Aelst, P. (2005). Who demonstrates? Antistate Rebels, Conventional Participants, or Everyone? Comparative Politics, 37(2).
O’Donnell, G, Schmitter, P. (1986). Transitions from Authoritarian Rule. University of Notre Dame Press.
Otaola, M. L. (2017). To include or not to include? Party representation in electoral institutions and confidence in elections: A comparative study of Latin America. Party Politics.
Pastor, R. A. (1999). The Role of Electoral Administration in Democratic Transitions: implications for policy and research. Democratization, 6(4), 1-27.
Przeworski, A. (1991). Democracy and the market : political and economic reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge University Press.
Rosas, G. (2010). Trust in elections and the institutional design of electoral authorities: Evidence from Latin America. Electoral Studies (29), 74-90.
Schedler, A. (2004). Measuring the Formal Independence of Electoral Governance. CIDE.
Schedler, A. (2009). Inconsistencias contaminantes: gobernacion electoral y conflicto poselectoral en las elecciones presidenciales del 2006 en México. América Latina Hoy (51), 41-59.
Sedziaka, A., Rose, R. (2015). Do contentious elections catalize mass protests? In P. Norris, R. W. Frank, and F. Martinez i Coma (Eds.), Contentious Elections: from ballots to barricades. Routledge.
Tarouco, G. (2016). The Role of Political Parties in Electoral Governance: Delegation and the Quality of Elections in Latin America. Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy, 15(1), 83-95.
Tarouco, G. (2017). Electoral governance in Latin America and the behaviour of oppositions. In H. A. Garnett and M. Zavadskaya (Eds.), Electoral Integrity and Political Regimes: Actors, Strategies and Consequences. Routledge.
Tarouco, G. (2020). Political Parties and Electoral Governance: Institutional change in Latin America. 12.º Encontro da Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política. https://cienciapolitica.org.br/eventos/12o-encontro-abcp/anais
Tomz, M., King, G., Zeng, L. (1999). ReLogit: Rare Events Logistic Regression. Harvard University. http://gking.harvard.edu/
Ugues Jr., A. (2014). Electoral management bodies in central America. In P. Norris, R. W., Frank, and F. Martinez i Coma (Eds.), Advancing Electoral Integrity. Oxford University Press.
Wasserstein, R. L., Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose. The American Statistician, 70(2), 129-133.
Zavadskaya, M. (2017). When Do Elections Subvert Authoritarianism? Electoral Malpractice and Variety of Post-Electoral Scenarios. In H. A. Garnett and M. Zavadskaya (Eds.), Electoral Integrity and Political Regimes: Actors, Strategies and Consequences. Routledge.
Zmerli, S., Van der Meer, T. W. G. (Eds.) (2017). Handbook on Political Trust. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Política
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
